PDF(129 KB)
Fuzzy Integral Multiple Criteria Decision Making Method Based on Fuzzy Preference Relation on Alternatives
Qiaojiao ZHAO, Ling ZENG, Jinjin LIU
Journal of Systems Science and Information ›› 2016, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (3) : 280-290.
PDF(129 KB)
PDF(129 KB)
Fuzzy Integral Multiple Criteria Decision Making Method Based on Fuzzy Preference Relation on Alternatives
A new method is proposed to solve the multiple criteria decision making with interacting criteria, where the preference information on alternatives in a fuzzy relation given by the decision maker. On the basis of the decision maker's preference information, two types of models—the least squares model, the linear programming model—are constructed to determine the capacities and then to select the most desirable alternative. Finally, a numerical example is used to illustrate the validity and practicality of the proposed method.
Choquet integral / multiple criteria decision making / fuzzy preference information / interacting criteria {{custom_keyword}} /
[1] Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M. Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys. Springer Science and Business Media, 2005.
[2] Greco S, Mousseau V, Slowi´nski R. Robust ordinal regression for value functions handling interacting criteria. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 239(3): 711-730.
[3] Choquet G. Theory of capacities//Annales de l'institut Fourier. Institut Fourier, 1954, 5: 131-295.
[4] Grabisch M. The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 1996, 89(3): 445-456.
[5] Murofushi T, Sugeno M. An interpretation of fuzzy measures and the Choquet integral as an integral with respect to a fuzzy measure. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1989, 29(2): 201-227.
[6] Grabisch M, Labreuche C. A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid. Annals of Operations Research, 2010, 175(1): 247-286.
[7] Grabisch M. Fuzzy integral in multicriteria decision making. Fuzzy sets and Systems, 1995, 69(3): 279-298.
[8] Grabisch M. The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 1996, 89(3): 445-456.
[9] Sugeno M. Construction of fuzzy measures and evaluation of similarity patterns by fuzzy integral. Transactions of the SICE, 1973, 9: 361-368.
[10] Grabisch M. K-order additive discrete fuzzy measures and their representation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1997, 92(2): 167-189.
[11] Marichal J L. Tolerant or intolerant character of interacting criteria in aggregation by the Choquet integral. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 155(3): 771-791.
[12] Marichal J L. k-intolerant capacities and Choquet integrals. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 177(3): 1453-1468.
[13] Takahagi E. A fuzzy measure identification method by diamond pairwise comparisons and φs transformation. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 2008, 7(3): 219-232.
[14] Wu J Z, Zhang Q. 2-order additive fuzzy measure identification method based on diamond pairwise comparison and maximum entropy principle. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 2010, 9(4): 435-453.
[15] Wu J Z, Zhang Q, Du Q, et al. Compromise principle based methods of identifying capacities in the framework of multicriteria decision analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2014, 246: 91-106.
[16] Mori T, Murofushi T. An analysis of evaluation model using fuzzy measure and the Choquet integral. 5th Fuzzy System Symposium, 1989: 207-212.
[17] Beliakov G. Construction of aggregation functions from data using linear programming. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2009, 160(1): 65-75.
[18] Marichal J L, Roubens M. Determination of weights of interacting criteria from a reference set. European Journal of Operational Research, 2000, 124(3): 641-650.
[19] Angilella S, Greco S, Matarazzo B. Non-additive robust ordinal regression: A multiple criteria decision model based on the Choquet integral. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 201(1): 277-288.
[20] Angilella S, Greco S, Lamantia F, et al. Assessing non-additive utility for multicriteria decision aid. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 158(3): 734-744.
[21] Foerster J F. Mode choice decision process models: A comparison of compensatory and non-compensatory structures. Transportation Research Part A: General, 1979, 13(1): 17-28.
[22] Zhang Q, Wang Y, Yang Y. Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making with eight types of preference information on alternatives. 2007 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, 2007.
[23] Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E. Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1998, 97(1): 33-48.
[24] Fan Z P, Ma J, Zhang Q. An approach to multiple attribute decision making based on fuzzy preference information on alternatives. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2002, 131(1): 101-106.
[25] Grabisch M, Kojadinovic I, Meyer P. A review of methods for capacity identification in Choquet integral based multi-attribute utility theory: Applications of the Kappalab R package. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 186(2): 766-785.
[26] Angilella S, Corrente S, Greco S. Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis for the Choquet integral preference model and the scale construction problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 2015, 240(1): 172-182.
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61163041); the Science and Technology Research Program of the Higher Education Institutions of Guangxi, China (2013YB087); Innovation Project of GUET Graduate Education (YJCXS201553)
PDF(129 KB)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
